Humanity on the BRINK –
Research Report from
Barrie Trower - Frequencies that KILL . . .
Barrie Trower
September 2013
With Deference to all Scientists:
this Research Report has been written for all students and non-scientists to
understand.
Abstract
As stated by University Researchers,
Government Scientists and International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7%
of schoolgirls exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of
suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically damaged children,
when they give birth. Any genetic damage
may pass to successive generations.
Wifi – a
Thalidomide in the Making – Who Cares?
Professor John R Goldsmith,
International / Advisor Consultant for R.F. Communication, Epidemiology and
Communications Sciences Advisor to the World Health Organisation, Military and
University Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of
microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:
“Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy....”(1)
The level of irradiation incident
upon the women was stated, as from, five microwatts per centimetre
squared. This level of irradiation may
seem meaningless to a non-scientist; however, when I say that it is below what most schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi-fi transmitters, from
the age of approximately five years upwards, this level becomes more
meaningful.
A distinction here must be made and a
very important one: schoolgirls are not women. Schoolgirls are children and children are
both neurologically and physiologically different from adults. A child’s brain tissue / bone marrow has
different electrical conductivity properties than adults due to the higher
water content (2) (this renders the Specific Absorption Rate obsolete). Children’s absorption of microwave radiation
can be ten times higher than adults. Permanent low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative
and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria
(mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can
cause irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times
more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell
nucleus). Mitochondrial DNA is
irreparable due to its low histone protein content, therefore any damage
(genetic or otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through
the maternal line. (3)
Hence, we are subjecting each
successive female generation to harm. Whether these two ten-fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are
additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point. Either way we are facing the equivalent of a
pandemic. I was invited to present a
lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor commented on a +60%
foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm animals. All mammalian species will of course suffer
the same consequence resulting from low-level microwave irradiation. There is very little difference
‘biologically’ between our embryonic cells.
I invite the Reader to peruse my
diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the
ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.
Simple
Explanation
Imagine you are five years old, in
school and sitting with a wi-fi laptop near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become
irradiated until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your
follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy
child.
Should you become a pregnant as a
student, your embryo (for its first 100 days – if it is female) is producing
approximately 400,000 follicles (within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The problem is that these developing
follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had
every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult
(with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child
(your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during
conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.
Beyond
Belief
The shocking truth is, not only was
all of this known and documented long before wi-fi was ever put in front of
children, but the dangerous biological effects were concealed (as they are to
this day) from the general public, in order to protect the industries profit.
Professor Goldsmith writes:
“.....effects from exposure to RF radiation in certain populations:
reproductive effects.....increased spontaneous abortion.....increased incidence
of childhood and other cancers.....” (1)
Confirming this with more than 2000
references is the Naval Medical Research Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography of Reported Biological
Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and
Radio-Frequency Radiation’ highlight ‘......Altered Menstrual Activity /
Altered Foetal Development.....’ (4)
The World Health Organization’s
‘International Symposium’ Research Agreement No. 05-609-04 ‘Biological Effects
and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its 350 pages: Biological effects, health and excess mortality
from artificial irradiation of Radio Frequency Microwaves. Section 28 deals with problems concerning
Reproductive Function.
This document was classed as ‘Top
Secret’ and its contents withheld by WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission
on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). (5)
Eldon Byrd, a scientist for the Naval
Surface Weapon Centre of the US Navy, in one of his 1986 lectures on the
effects of low-level microwaves, is referenced as stating:
‘.....we can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue.....cause up to six
times higher foetus mortality and birth defects....’. (6)
Finally, the Mobile
Telecommunications Industry carried out a very thorough and exhaustive
scientific study on its own product. This industries conclusion was:
Sec. 7 “.....it can be concluded that
electro-magnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer.”
“.....Direct
damage on the DNA as well as influences on the DNA
synthesis and DNA repair mechanisms.....” (7)
(Note I have underscored the relevant words
here.)
Note: DNA synthesis is essential for healthy
embryonic / foetal / child’s growth.
With
these few of the roughly 8000 research articles showing this phenomena; in
order to protect this industries’ profit, the United States Defence
Intelligence Agency sent a ‘document’ to ‘advanced nations’ describing the
problem and suggesting ‘how to deceive the public’.
It read:
“.....if
the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent
exposure standards, there could be unfavourable effects on industrial
output.....exposed to microwave radiation below thermal levels experience
more.....” (8)
NB: Industrial output is of course...profit. A very relaxed exposure standard also makes
it very difficult to take the industry to court.
This (and
two other documents with ref. 8) then continues to list many physiological and
neurological dangers from low-level: below thermal, microwave irradiation inc:
blood disorders, heart problems, psychiatric symptoms and ‘menstrual
disorders’.
*Wi-fi
is of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.*
In order
to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted the ICNIRP guideline,
whereby, the only safety limit is just six-minutes of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm in six minutes, wi-fi is deemed to be safe.
No
consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below thermal’ cellular
interaction as listed by several countries including the United States; which
were (and are) known to cause: cancer, severe neuropathological symptoms,
foetal defects and literally hundreds of illnesses related to cellular
disorders.
Countries
following ICNIRP continue to argue that their six minute warming effect is all
that is required regarding microwave irradiation.
Should
the Reader be wondering whether I am ‘as mad as a box of frogs’ and thinking
‘no government would ever harm its citizens for money, especially pregnant
women’; I invite the Reader to investigate Government decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow disease),
lead in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military personnel serving in
the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent Orange sprayed over the food crops
in Vietnam. To this day, many global
birth defects stem from these Government / Government Scientific / Military
decisions: with industrial
advisors.
If
further evidence is required, I invite the Reader to read documents released
under the Freedom of Information Act; namely, Operations: Pandora, MK Ultra, MK
Chaos, Cointelpro, MK Delta, MK Naomi, MK Search, Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter,
Sleeping Beauty and Grill Flame.
Here,
secret experiments carried out by the Military / Government scientists upon
unsuspecting civilians, namely: students, servicemen, psychiatric patients,
poor, children over the age of 4 years, pregnant women, Muslims, Catholics,
prisoners, handicapped, deaf, blind, homosexuals, single women, elderly, school
children, ‘marginal groups’ and dissidents; served to increase their knowledge
and understanding of; what is commonly known as...Stealth Warfare.
Progress
on the study of illnesses caused by low-level microwave irradiation continues
to this day. One current study on cancer
and neurological harm continues until 2018 and involves women who could be
pregnant. (9)
Progress
Reports are also fed back to Governmental Scientists:
“.....students
will understand the nature of RF...bioeffects research, including human /
animal studies.....students will become familiar with current state of
knowledge on potential health effects RF, such as cancer, memory loss, and
birth defects.” (10)
NB: RF has become a generic term (Radio
Frequency) to avoid using the term ‘microwave’. It poses less ‘safety queries’ as the word ‘radio’ itself, which used to
refer to ‘long wave radio’ was domestically non threatening.
Intentional Ignorance
Governmental
Intransigence forces a moratorium upon the risks of exposure to future
generations. Both the Communications
Industry and Governmental studies have proved that protein synthesis (the using
of chemical structures to ‘build’ the roughly 4050 foetal and 4500 adults
designated biological / neurological structures) can be influenced by low-level
microwave irradiation. This moratorium
seems to spread to organizations either relying on Governmental funding, or for
whatever reason; acquiescence. However,
not all research departments suppress the truth.
A
brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms that low-level
microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating (thermal) effect, can affect
cellular signalling processes. (11)
The Main Risks to Children
These
biological processes described as being ‘influenced’ by low-level microwave
irradiation may not just damage foetal growth; relying on the same biological
processes are:
Blood Brain Barrier – requires 18 months to form and protects
the brain from toxins. It is known to be
effected.
Myelin Sheath – requires 22 years to build its 122 layers. It is responsible for all thinking, organ and
muscle processes.
Brain – requires 20 years to develop (I can assure you,
cell phones do not help in its development).
Immune System – requires 18 years to develop. Bone marrow and Bone Density are known to be
affected by low-level microwaves as are the immune systems’ white blood cells.
Bones – requires 28 years to develop – as mentioned the
moisture content of children makes both the ‘soft bones’ and marrow
particularly attractive to microwave irradiation. Bone marrow produces blood cells.
Clearly,
our decision makers are overlooking a child illness pandemic hitherto unknown
in our 40,000 generations of civilization; which can involve over a half of the
World’s exposed mothers / children.
The Very Sad Truth
I have
been very honoured to address approximately 40 Royals, Governments, Leaders of
Governments, Leaders of Peoples and Government Officials over the years.
My
address (text) to one King concerning the numbers of ill children was placed on
the internet. (12)
I
referenced over 200 cancer / leukaemia clusters in schools (up to the time of
data collection) from low level microwave transmitters in schools. There were many different types of cancers,
leukaemias, miscarriages and breast cancers of staff. These continue, mostly only recorded locally,
to this day.
When this
was discussed in the English Parliament (as one of the EU Countries involved),
a Minister dismissed it and lied to the House of Commons. My request to prove this lie was denied.
Possibly,
the most respected children’s charity in the World: UNICEF, joined forces with
the World’s leading authority on the effects of harm from low-level microwave
irradiation:
The
Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: in their
research document ‘Health Effect on Children and Teenagers’ found;
85% increase in Central Nervous
System Disorders
36% increase in epilepsy
11% increase in mental retardation
82% increase in blood immune disorders and Risk to Foetus. (13)
NB. The Reader may think that the cell phone
irradiation is different from wi-fi as it has more power. In fact wi-fi can be more harmful
because of its lower power! Low power
can enter the body and cause harm. All
electromagnetic waves are accumulative. If they are below the body’s threshold to cause activation of the
necessary proteins required to defend and repair tissues, the damage
accumulates very slowly and is undetectable like a cancer. Think of sunbathing on a cloudy day, you can
still burn your skin.
The Good Guys
I have a list of nine
countries (some of whom I am working with) who are actively, either taking
wi-fi out of schools or in the legal argument-stage of this process. I decline to publically name these countries
as my actions may interfere with their legal negotiations.
The Parliamentary Assembly
(Assemblee Parlimentaire) Council of Europe Document 12608, published on
6.5.2011 in section 8.3.2. states:
‘.....ban all mobile phones, DECTphones or Wi-Fi or WLAN systems from classrooms and
schools.....’
For legal reasons this had to
be changed to a ‘wired system is preferred’. However, the meaning is clear.
In a translated document,
Professor Yuri Grigoriev of the Russian Committee for Non Ionizing Radiation
Protection wrote on 19.6.2012
‘.....recommend
the use of wired networks and not networks using the wireless broadband access
systems, including wi-fi, in schools and educational establishments.’
A document dated 25.3.2013
(updated from 19.3.2013) by the Executive Committee of the American Academy of
Environmental Medicine wrote a letter to the Los Angeles Unified School
District with the following recommendation:
‘.....do not add
to the burden of public health by installing blanket wireless internet
connections in Los Angeles Schools.’
Just prior to this in
December 2012 the American Academy of Pediatrics (representing 60,000
Paediatricians) wrote to Congress requesting more protection from low-level
microwave irradiation for children and pregnant women: with regard to wi-fi in schools, they write:
‘.....this is an
unprecedented exposure with unknown outcome on the health and reproductive
potential of a generation.’ (14)
In 2002, 36,000 Physicians
and Scientists etc. signed the ‘Freiburg Appeal’. Ten years hence, it has been
re-launched. It specifically warns
against the use of Wi-fi and the irradiation of children, adolescents and
pregnant women. ‘Freiburg’ is an
International Doctors’ Appeal.
The
Reader will appreciate that collectively there are approximately 100,000 of the
World’s most knowledgeable professionals expostulating this same warning.
As an
aside, should the Reader be wondering why I have not mentioned school-boys and
whether they can be affected in a similar way to girls: the answer is ‘yes’.
DNA sperm
fragmentation from wi-fi levels of irradiation, have been published. (15) It would require many more pages to comment
upon this phenomenon and there is already a plethora of data both available and
published.
Pulsing / Modulations
During the ‘Cold War’ conflict, whilst I
was collating effects from microwave pulses / modulations caused by brain
entrainment, resonance (both cyclotronic and circadian), rectification (at
boundaries within the body) generated by electrically induced phase transition;
it came to my attention that a list needed to be published for all microwave
communication systems. (16)
In this Open Letter, I list 1 to 40 Hz
(pulses / modulations per second) and their corresponding neurological /
physiological response.
In his most explanatorily descriptive
paper, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy writes.....
‘.....For
example, Grigoriev et. Al. (2010) showed that 30 days exposure to unmodulated
2450 MHz microwave radiation triggered a small but significant increase in
anti-brain antibodies in the blood of rats.....which could then result in an
auto immune attack on the brain and / or nervous system. An example of an auto immune disease of the
brain is Graves disease in which the pituitary gland (at the base of the brain)
is affected.’ (17)
NB. 2450 M Hz is the wi-fi frequency.
If you add the pulse / modulation frequency
to the above; fatigue, depression, psychiatric problems (such as anger), loss
of appetite and problems with movement can also be induced.
The
Bad Guys
With gargantuan profits to be made, it is
of no surprise that the English Parliamentary system choose to follow ICNIRP
and their well established ‘Active Denial’ policy.
I became familiar with our ‘corruption’
when during the late 60’s – 70’s, I was commissioned to investigate (under a
programme initiated by Sir William Melvin (1911)) corruption within the
hierarchy of the London Metropolitan Police and the non-elected Members of the
English Parliament. Should the Reader be
dismissive of such actions, I suggest looking at any of our Sunday newspapers
over the past 45 years, including now.
When a Reverend lady wrote to a Minister,
Nick Gibb MP, concerning Wi-fi in schools, his standard reply (which I have
seen many times) stated:
“.....advice given.....by UK Health
Protection Agency..... ‘There is no consistent evidence of health effects from
RF exposures below guideline levels and no reason why schools and others should
not use Wi-fi equipment.” (18)
This
letter is designed to deceive (and it is very successful). Look to the words ‘no consistent
evidence’. Let me explain please.
If I were
to carry out an experiment on every single person who went through the doors of
your main airport on any busy day and told them that they must drink one pint
of beer and smoke ten cigarettes a day forever; some would react immediately,
especially children. Others would react
over days, weeks, months and years (many years in some cases). Then there would be those who would
thoroughly enjoy the experiment and probably never be ill. That does not mean that alcohol and
cigarettes are safe. It shows that
people are not homogenous (all alike / identical). In other words, the conclusion of my
experiment would be that there is: ‘no consistent evidence’.
Other
Ministerial letters usually say: “most of our research” or “most of our scientists” – both of which
are equally meaningless.
What they
never say is: Wi-fi is safe.
It will
come as no surprise to the Reader to learn that I have been refused permission
to have a face-to-face meeting with my MP, Mr Mel Stride. Hence my Member of Parliament has
successfully brought the ‘shutters down’ on any access I may have had to
Government. This act by Mr Stride became
a ‘feature’ in our West Country newspaper by leading Journalist Paul James.
(19)
During my
last attempt to contact my MP, his Secretary, Dominic just hung-up the
telephone on me.
Years
ago, when I started to ‘advise caution’ re microwaving children / pregnant
women; the Academic Registrar of my own University (Exeter) forbade me from
ever communicating with it, ever again. A similar message came from Dr. Jamie Harle of the Open University (Medical
Physics), who said: “Your work is too political.”
Clearly
in England, some universities and some parliamentary persons are more afraid of
governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth. Regardless of the consequences.
Two Womens’ Stories
The
Real Price of Intentional Ignorance and Greed. Those Consequences.
Ten
telephone calls a day would not be unusual for me. I even receive calls Christmas Day / Easter
Sunday. Two calls which summarize those
from women are illustrated below. Both
are actual conversations.
i)
“.....my
daughter had just died. I am holding her hand. She has just had her 11th birthday and she was number 11 to
die since the transmitter for Wi-fi was put near her and others’ desk.....”
ii)
“.....my child is one of several with cancer
/ birth genetic problems. These only
started after the transmitter was turned on. My worries are two-fold and take every second of my life. Will my child ever marry or find a partner
and be happy? What will happen when I
die? I know I will die worrying. Regardless of who is to blame, it is me, the
Mother who carries guilt and responsibility.....” (20)
I Ask for Readers’ Help, Please.
Imagine
57.7% of all of the schoolgirls with Wi-fi in their classrooms: all day – all
year – all through their school career, in every country using it, in the
World!
In just
two generations we could have more dead / sick infants than resulted from both
World Wars. And, these are not my figures, they come from Government advisors /
research.
Advanced
requests for this ‘Paper’ have been received from Royalty, Governmental
Officers (outside of the UK) and people I will describe as ‘interesting’.
As
shutters fall blocking every direction I try to turn, I ask: “Can
the Reader succeed in preventing this ‘Pandemic’ where I will fail?”
I have
two requests:
i)
Would
a Royal or Leading Governmental Official please ask the British Prime Minister,
face to face, why he told my MP, Mr Stride, that he is ‘too busy’ to see me for
just one hour to discuss this issue.
ii)
If
every Reader sends just two copies of this Paper to people who may be able make
a decision (preferably influential women); with mathematical progression – the
original 100 advanced requests will soon land on a desk of somebody who can
make a difference.
International Challenge
When I am
invited to speak in countries, I invariably end up on the radio / TV news /
documentary channels. Thence, I issue a
challenge:
I ask for
any scientist(s) from industry / government to ‘humiliate’ me live ‘on-air’
with their expert knowledge by answering one question:
“What is the safe level of microwave
irradiation for the ovarian follicles during the first 100 days development of
the embryo?”
To date,
not a single scientist will appear and face me.
I mention
this because it is a question the Reader can ask any decision maker, school
Principal / Governor etc.
Should
any person provide the answer, the next statement is:
“Fine – we will send it to a Leading
Scientific Journal for independent Peer Review.” (With your research). (21)
The Solution
Education
need not suffer if Wi-fi is withdrawn world-wide. We have telephone lines – fibre-optic cable.
The
argument against these options is the cost. Compared to the future medical costs (forgetting the human cost), phone
/ fibre-cable shows to be a very cheap option.
Thank
you.
Barrie Trower
3 Flowers Meadow
Liverton
Devon TQ12 6UP
United Kingdom
In UK - 01626 821014
World – 00 44 1626 821014
One Reader may be the person who achieves more to help humanity than
any other modern day individual.
September 1st 2013
(This Paper
is copyright free)
Epilogue
Please note – I have
always worked free of charge and will represent any person in the world without
cost. PLEASE SEE ADDENDUM
Addendum – Recent Publications
Professors’
/ Doctors’ Panagopoulos, Johnasson and Carlo describe in their (June 2013
Published) Paper – how man-made electromagnetic waves (as used in the
communications industry) can cause interference, hence induced oscillations,
from these polarized waves. This in
turn, can induce biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific Absorption
Rate) obsolete.
They
write:
·
Man-made electromagnetic
waves...they are polarized...
·
....can produce
interference effect...This induced oscillation will be most intense on the free
particles which carry a net electric charge...a part of its energy...is
transferred to the charged / polar molecules of the medium...within biological
tissue there will be additional energy absorption by the water
dipoles...proteins, lipids or nucleic acids, which will also be forced to
oscillate by the applied field.
·
...man-made EMF’s can
produce severe biological alterations such as DNA damage without heating the
biological tissue...may lead to cancer, neurodegenerative deceases,
reproductive declines or even heritable mutations...conductivity varies for
different tissues and different field frequencies..The relative permittivity of an adult brain is calculated to be
around 40 while the corresponding value for a young child’s brain is between 60
and 80 resulting in almost double the radiation absorption and SAR...
·
...SAR offers no
information at all with respect to frequency, waveform or modulation... (Ref (22))
Dr
Dimitris Panagopoulos, Dep. of Biology, University of Athens also writes in his
2013 paper: Electromagnetic Interaction
Between Environmental Fields and Living Systems Determines Health and Well
Being:
·
Disturbances in the
communication between individual body clocks can desynchronize the circadian
system, which in turn may lead to unwellness, chronic fatigue, decreased
performance, obesity, neuropsychiatric disorders, and the development of
different diseases...
·
...endogenous electrical
balance in living organisms cannot occur in the presence of unnatural –
man-made – electromagnetic pollution..... GSM mobile phone radiation is found
to cause DNA damage on insect reproductive cells (gametes) and adversely affect
reproduction for intensities down to 1 microwatt per centimetre squared after
only a few minutes exposure..... (Ref (23))
References
|
---|